This section is from the book "Food Ingestion And Energy Transformations", by Francis G. Benedict, Thorne M. Carpenter. See also: Food Combining and Digestion: Easy to Follow Techniques to Increase Stomach Power and Maximize Digestion.
The results just discussed were obtained with men in good health, from 17 to 40 years of age. Unfortunately the observations of the metabolism of individuals over 30 years of age are not so extended as they should be; we are thus unable to state definitely that the lowering of the metabolism noted in practically all instances with people of advanced years had not already begun with the subjects about 40 years of age, but our evidence thus far obtained does not lead us to infer this.
In any attempt to draw general conclusions from these short-period experiments we should depend more especially upon the values found for the oxygen consumption, as, being uninfluenced by the previous diet, they give a clearer picture of the actual metabolism. A general review of the results in tables 37 to 42 and of the results from which the average values in tables 43 to 45 are drawn shows that with all of the subjects the individual values fluctuated considerably at times, but that the average values from period to period indicate no general change one way or the other. The average values for the experiments during a period of several months or years show a general constancy in the metabolism, there being but few average values which vary widely from the general average for the whole period. This is emphasized by the fact that the general mean variations for the various subjects were not large. The general constancy in the metabolism during the different hours of the day and during different months and years thus seems to be fairly well established by these data, at least for individuals between 17 and 40 years of age.
The variations in the individual values make clear the fact that single determinations should not be relied upon and that in order to obtain a value for the basal metabolism it is necessary to secure two or three well-agreeing periods for averaging. Inasmuch as the average values from period to period did not tend to change in any one direction, they were evidently free from diurnal influence; this factor may therefore be eliminated in considering the results of comparison experiments in which the metabolism during fast is first determined and subsequently the metabolism after food. This leads us, therefore, to the general conclusion that the determination of basal values immediately prior to the ingestion of food is the most logical and satisfactory method for studying the small changes in the metabolism frequently noted after the ingestion of food.
Subject, naked weight,1 height, age.1 | Time covered by experiments. | Observation. | First half hour.2 | Second half hour. | Third half hour. | Fourth half hour. | Fifth half hour. | Sixth half hour. | Seventh half hour. | Eighth half hour. |
H. R. R. 69.5 kilos, 185 cm..19 yr. | 1 periods, Apr. 22, 1915, to April 23, 1915. | Avg.CO2. | c.c. 216 | c.c. 208 | c.c. 211 | c.c. | c.c. | c.c. | c.c. | c.c. |
Avg. O2.. | 278 | 272 | 270 | |||||||
[Days..... | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||
A. J. 0. 69.3 kilos, 180 cm., 30 yr. | 100 periods, Nov. 4, 1914, to Feb. 8, 1915. | Avg.C02. | 216 | 214 | 208 | 207 | 206 | 202 | 208 | 200 |
Avg. O2.. | 252 | 250 | 247 | 247 | 254 | 247 | 259 | 241 | ||
[Days. . . . | 6 | 22 | 20 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||
K. H. A. 66.4 kilos, 182 cm., 26yr. | 139 periods, July 27, 1911, to June 26, 1912. | Avg.CO2. | 2033 | 189 | 185 | 197 | 192 | 194 | 194 | 193 |
Days..... | 1 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 23 | 19 | 18 | 12 | ||
Avg. 02. . | 2523 | 228 | 241 | 241 | 242 | 238 | 236 | 238 | ||
Days. . . . | 1 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 23 | 18 | 18 | 12 | ||
J. R. 66.0 kilos, 182 cm., 27 yr. | 54 periods, Feb. 25, 1909, to June 2, 1909. | Avg.C02. | 2313 | 211 | 213 | 202 | 199 | 200 | 204 | 200 |
Days..... | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 6 | ||
Avg. 02. . | 2523 | 244 | 237 | 242 | 244 | 246 | 244 | 245 | ||
Days.... | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | ||
J. J. C. 65.0 kilos, 175cm., 26 yr. | 258 periods, Feb. 26, 1909, to Apr. 25, 1911. | Avg.CO2. | 194 | 193 | 191 | 193 | 189 | 188 | 189 | 191 |
Days. . . . | 2 | 12 | 37 | 38 | 42 | 29 | 26 | 24 | ||
Avg. O2. . | 241 | 229 | 231 | 230 | 229 | 225 | 227 | 229 | ||
Days..... | 2 | 11 | 35 | 38 | 40 | 28 | 24 | 23 | ||
H. W. F. 58.0 kilos, 174 cm., 25 yr. | 41 periods, Jan. 27, 1915, to July 30, 1915. | Avg.C02. | 178 | 162 | 164 | 172 | ||||
Avg.02.. | 224 | 205 | 210 | 223 | ||||||
(Days..... | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
H. F. T. 57.8 kilos, 179 cm., 32 yr. | 272 periods, June 8, 1911, to Jan. 30, 1912. | Avg.C02. | 1684 | 158 | 158 | 173 | 168 | 172 | 171 | 167 |
Days.... | 6 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 28 | 20 | 27 | ||
Avg. O2. . | 2004 | 191 | 192 | 195 | 198 | 193 | 194 | 194 | ||
Days..... | 6 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 27 | 20 | 26 | ||
V. G. 54.7 kilos, 162 cm., 17 jr. | 63 periods, Nov. 4, 1910, to Mar. 11, 1911. | Avg. C02. | 201 | 194 | 190 | 197 | 198 | 219 | 204 | 190 |
Days..... | 6 | 11 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | ||
Avg. 02. . | 240 | 229 | 228 | 229 | 236 | 233 | 231 | 230 | ||
Days..... | 6 | 11 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | ||
T. H. H. 54.5 kilos, 171 cm., 29 yr. | 44 periods, Feb. 17, 1915, to Mar. 31, 1915. | Avg.C02. | 176 | 179 | 182 | 175 | 167 | |||
Avg. 02.. | 205 | 205 | 207 | 199 | 199 | |||||
Days. . . . | 3 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 1 | |||||
W. K. 49.7 kilos, 162 cm., 29 yr. | 39 periods, Feb. 20, 1915, to July 16, 1915. | Avg. C02. | 167 | 169 | 164 | 163 | ||||
Avg. 02. . | 196 | 200 | 194 | 201 | ||||||
[Days..... | 3 | 6 | 5 | 1 | ||||||
T. M. C. 48.5 kilos, 165 cm., 32 yr. | 100 periods, Mar. 23, 1909, to May 27, 1914. | Avg. C02. | 168 | 157 | 154 | 152 | 152 | 153 | 155 | 156 |
Days..... | 4 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 15 | 14 | 11 | 9 | ||
Avg. O2. . | 183 | 188 | 184 | 183 | 180 | 183 | 187 | 188 | ||
Days..... | 4 | 9 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 10 | 9 |
1Average body-weight and average age for the series of experiments.
2The experimental periods were usually 15 minutes in length and in most instances there was but one period in the half hour. The average time of the first period used was at all times approximately between 8 a. m. and 9 a. m., except as otherwise noted.
3The average time of the first period with this subject was 7 a. m.
4The average time of the first period with this subject was 6h30m a. m. subjects in post-absorptive condition and lying on couch. (Values per minute).
Ninth half hour. | Tenth half hour. | Eleventh half hour. | Twelfth half hour. | Thirteenth half hour. | Fourteenth half hour. | Fifteenth half hour. | Sixteenth half hour. | Seventeenth half hour. | Eighteenth half hour. | Nineteenth half hour. | Twentieth half hour. | Twenty-first half hour. | Average of daily averages. | Subject, naked, weight,1 height, age.1 |
ex. | c.c. | c.c. | c.c. | C.C. | c.c. | c.c. | ex. | ex. | c.c. | c.c. | ex. | c.c. | c.c. | |
218 | 219 | 209 | 213] | H. R.R. 69.5 kilos, 185 cm., 19 yr. | ||||||||||
289 | 292 | 285 | 280 | |||||||||||
1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
199 | 205 | 212 | 203 | 205 | 210] | A. J. O. 69.3 kilos, 180 cm., 30 yr. | ||||||||
247 | 251 | 252 | 247 | 254 | 249 | |||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 24, | |||||||||
198 | 190 | 194 | 194 | 194 | 190 | 201 | 194] | K. H. A. 66.4 kilos, 182 cm., 26 yr. | ||||||
11 | 13 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 28 | |||||||
237 | 232 | 236 | 235 | 242 | 236 | 240 | 239 | |||||||
11 | 13 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 28 | |||||||
207 | 199 | 188 | 202] | J. R. 66.0 kilos, 182 cm., 27 yr. | ||||||||||
6 | 3 | 2 | 12 | |||||||||||
245 | 253 | 240 | 243 | |||||||||||
6 | 3 | 2 | 12. | |||||||||||
191 | 189 | 188 | 193 | 196 | 208 | 206 | 204 | 191 | 191] | J. J. G. 65.0 kilos, 175 cm., 26 yr. | ||||
16 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 52 | |||||
234 | 234 | 237 | 242 | 229 | 243 | 233 | 240 | 240 | 230 | |||||
15 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 52J | |||||
168 | 172 | 185 | 180 | 176 | 171 | 172] | H. W. F. 58.0 kilos, 174 cm., 25 yr. | |||||||
206 | 211 | 231 | 224 | 217 | 213 | 214 | ||||||||
2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 9 | ||||||||
161 | 165 | 156 | 163 | 153 | 159 | 157 | 159 | 149 | 155 | 156 | 158 | 167 | 165] | H. F. T. 57.8 kilos, 179 cm., 32 yr. |
16 | 20 | 15 | 16 | 11 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 44 | |
189 | 194 | 185 | 187 | 179 | 186 | 185 | 190 | 181 | 190 | 189 | 189 | 188 | 192 | |
16 | 19 | 15 | 16 | 11 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 44 | |
198 | 196 | 195 | 191 | 199 | 195] | V. G. 54.7 kilos, 162 cm., 17yr. | ||||||||
3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 14 | |||||||||
231 | 240 | 230 | 233 | 233 | 231 | |||||||||
3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 14 | |||||||||
188 | 185 | 183 | 186 | 180] | T. H. H. 54.5 kilos, 171 cm., 29 yr. | |||||||||
. . | . . | 226 | 220 | 217 | 206 | 207 | ||||||||
2 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 12 | ||||||||||
151 | 159 | 166 | 169 | 178 | 170 | 175 | 165 | 168] | W. K. 49.7 kilos, 162 cm., 29 yr. | |||||
166 | 192 | 199 | 205 | 217 | 190 | 202 | 197 | 200 | ||||||
1 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | ||||||
161 | 165 | 162 | 154] | T. M. C. 48.5 kilos, 165 cm., 32 yr. | ||||||||||
3 | 2 | 2 | 18 | |||||||||||
196 | 188 | 190 | 184' | |||||||||||
4 | 2 | 2 | 18 |
 
Continue to: