The possible fluctuations in the metabolism have likewise been shown for 35 subjects1 who were studied for periods of time varying from 5 days to 4 years and 5 months. In all cases the subjects were in the post-absorptive condition and with complete muscular repose. The increase in the oxygen consumption is used as an index of the fluctuations of the metabolism, with the value for the minimum daily average as a basis. The figures indicate that the oxygen consumption varied above the minimum from 3.5 per cent to 31.3 per cent, with an average variation of 13.9 per cent. The greatest variations were found as a rule with those subjects studied for the longer periods.

The results obtained with many of these subjects were considered in more detail in the preceding section. By reference to tables 37 to 45 it will be seen that while the average values showed usually no tendency to change materially during the months or years the subjects were studied, yet the values for the individual periods often fluctuated widely. With such fluctuations it would not be logical to use a basal metabolism determined on one day for comparison with the metabolism determined on another day, except possibly when the superimposed factor to be measured is of considerable size, as in severe muscular work.

With well-trained subjects of long experience, an average basal value may be considered as more reliable than those obtained with untrained subjects. Perhaps one of the best illustrations of the constancy of metabolism with a thoroughly well trained subject is that of the professional bicycle rider, M. A. M., studied by Benedict and Cathcart,2 whose metabolism was determined practically every morning for several months. (See tables 47 and 48.) The uniformity of the average metabolism for the day throughout this extended period is striking, to say the least, the variations in the metabolism being small. In fact, these particular experiments have been cited as conclusive evidence that when the base-line has once been fairly established it may, with propriety, suffice as a common base-line for subsequent use. But in physiological experimenting of this kind a subject is rarely so completely under control that he can be used daily for several weeks and even months in experiments with a respiration apparatus. Such conditions have never, we believe, been duplicated in experiments in which the influence of the ingestion of food had been primarily considered.

1Benedict, Journ. Biol. Chem., 1915, 20, p. 263, table 4. 2Benedict and Cathcart, Carnegie Inst. Wash. Pub. No. 187, 1913.

In studying a superimposed factor with a great increase in metabolism, such as that commonly occurring in severe muscular work experiments, the use of a common base-line is open to the least objection, but most factors have a less pronounced effect upon the metabolism than severe muscular work. Even with so constant a metabolism as that of M. A. M., it would be impossible to use an average basal value in many experiments with him on the influence of the ingestion of food, for the variations in the metabolism in the supposedly satisfactory collection of basal values were at times plus or minus 5 or 10 per cent, and the total effect of many processes of digestion fall well within this limit.

The constancy in the average metabolism shown in tables 37 to 45 confirm in practically every detail the general conclusions drawn by Gigon2 from the basal data obtained by him with the Sonden-Tigerstedt apparatus in Stockholm and the Jaquet apparatus in Basel, and subsequently by means of another apparatus employing a spirometer, Muller valves, and mouthpiece, in the Poliklinik in Basel. Since the data obtained with the Stockholm apparatus were exclusively confined to carbon-dioxide production, they can not be taken as comparable values for indicating constancy in the total heat production. Nevertheless it is important to note that, even on the basis of the figures presented by Gigon, variations of nearly 10 per cent are found, which far exceed in many instances the variations found in observations following the ingestion of the several foodstuffs.

Table 47. - Carbon Dioxide Produced At Different Times Of Day In Respiration Experiments; Subject M. A. M., In Post-Absorptive Condition And Lying On Couch

(Values per minute).

Average age, 29 years. Average body-weight (naked), 66.0 kilograms. Height, 177 cm.

Date.

Duration of experiments.

First half hour.1

Second half hour.1

Third half hour.1

Fourth half hour.1

Fifth half hour.1

Sixth half hour.1

Average.

1911.

c.c.

C.C.

c.c.

C.C.

C.C.

C.C.

C.C.

Dec. 7

9h04ma.m. to 10h41ma.m.. .

...

229

227

219

226

. . •

225

8

8 37 a.m. to 10 04 a.m.. .

203

203

202

211

...

205

11

10 11 a.m. to 11 16 a.m.. .

...

...

194

190

200

195

12

8 57 a.m. to 10 02 a.m.. .

202

197

195

198

13

8 33 a.m. to 9 37 a.m.. .

200

196

203

...

...

200

14

8 50 a.m. to 9 52 a.m.. .

. . .

217

214

216

. .

...

216

15

8 29 a.m. to 9 31 a.m.. .

202

205

194

...

. .

• . •

200

19

8 32 a.m. to 9 34 a.m. .

204

200

196

. .

...

200

20

8 25 a.m. to 9 19 a.m.. .

203

194

186

...

. .

...

194

21

8 22 a.m. to 9 15 a.m...

202

199

196

. .

199

22

8 27 a.m. to 9 22 a.m...

199

195

188

194

1he experimental periods were usually 15 minutes in length and there was but one period in each half hour. 2Gigon, Munch, med. Wochenschr., 1911, 58, p. 1343.

Date.

Duration of experiments.

First half hour.1

Second half hour.1

Third half hour.1

Fourth half hour.1

Fifth half hour.1

Sixth half hour.1

Average.

1912.

c.c.

c.c.

C.C.

c.c.

c.c.

c.c.

c.c.

Jan. 1

9 33 a.m. to 8 35 a.m.. .

206

208

209

...

208

2

8 49 a.m. to 9 26 a.m.. .

198

200

..

199

3

8 26 a.m. to 9 24 a.m.. .

201

199

201

...

200

4

8 26 a.m. to 8 41 a.m.. .

214

> * •

...

214

5

8 29 a.m. to 8 44 a.m.. .

213

• • •

...

213

8

8 34 a.m. to 9 10 a.m...

205

204

205

0

8 30 a.m. to 9 10 a.m.. .

215

207

211

10

8 29 a.m. to 9 07 a.m.. .

206

211

■ • •

...

209

12

8 34 a.m. to 9 10 a.m.. .

228

217

...

223

15

8 33 a.m. to 9 11 a.m.. .

235

229

232

16

8 36 a.m. to 9 14 a.m.. .

212

210

• • m

211

17

8 30 a.m. to 9 10 a.m.. .

196

187

• • •

192

18

8 30 a.m. to 9 09 a.m...

197

205

< • •

201

19

8 29 a.m. to 9 43 a.m.. .

196

200

201

• * •

..

199

23

8 42 a.m. to 9 47 a.m.. .

211

211

209

210

24

8 34 a.m. to 9 13 a.m.. .

210

192

■ . a

201

25

8 36 a.m. to 9 40 a.m.. .

202

201

195

199

26

8 32 a.m. to 9 11 a.m.. .

204

200

.

202

31

8 35 a.m. to 9 44 a.m.. .

227

221

218

222

Feb. 1

8 46 a.m. to 9 26 a.m.. .

212

216

214

2

8 40 a.m. to 9 43 a.m.. .

214

202

195

204

6

8 47 a.m. to 11 50 a.m.. .

•..

208

211

221

213

2208

2210

7

8 35 a.m. to 9 36 a.m.. .

206

190

189

• • «

a • •

195

8

8 36 a.m. to 9 31 a.m.. .

208

206

208

...

207

9

8 38 a.m. to 9 39 a.m.. .

196

191

183

190

13

8 38 a.m. to 9 43 a.m.. .

204

192

193

• • •

...

196

14

8 36 a.m. to 9 39 a.m.. .

206

194

207

.•

202

15

8 38 a.m. to 9 36 a.m.. .

191

187

187

...

188

16

8 40 a.m. to 9 40 a.m.. .

199

191

188

...

193

20

8 46 a.m. to 9 49 a.m.. .

189

209

203

...

200

21

8 39 a.m. to 9 44 a.m.. .

195

188

191

191

23

9 05 a.m. to 9 43 a.m.. .

209

200

...

205

26

8 41 a.m. to 9 45 a.m...

203

195

200

...

199

27

8 40 a.m. to 9 42 a.m.. .

218

202

208

• •

209

29

8 41 a.m. to 9 41 a.m.. .

202

229

217

...

216

Mar. 6

8 47 a.m. to 10 01 a.m.. .

• ■ •

235

229

225

• •

230

11

8 44 a.m. to 9 22 a.m.. .

• > >

218

212

• • •

...

215

20

12 45 p.m. to 2 02 p.m.. .

■ > •

• •

• ■ •

...

3200

22

8 22 a.m. to 10 35 a.m...

210

216

212

219

211

214

26

8 43 a.m. to 9 20 a.m.. .

210

202

...

206

29

8 43 a.m. to 9 50 a.m.. .

214

236

206

212

. .

217

Apr. 16

8 38 a.m. to 9 34 a.m...

234

207

212

■ • •

,,

218

1914.

Apr. 18

8 24 a.m. to 10 03 a.m. . .

198

186

196

193

193

Days....................

43

50

39

10

4

2

454

Minimum...............

189

186

183

193

190

200

188

Maximum...............

235

236

229

225

226

208

232

Average ..............

207

205

203

211

210

204

205

M. V...................

7.8

9.7

9.0

9.7

10.0

4.0

8.4

1The experimental periods were usually 15 minutes in length and there was but one period in each half hour.

2Two other results (seventh period, 207 c.c, and eighth period, 202 c.c.) were obtained and included in the average for the day.

3Average of results obtained in ninth to twelfth periods, 208, 190, 201, and 202 c.c, respectively.

4The total number of periods in which the carbon dioxide was determined in the 54 experiments was 154.

Accordingly, in the final selection of a determined basal value, it is of fundamental importance that we should bear in mind the fact that in averaging a large number of experiments the tendency is for all of the irregularities to be eliminated. For a comparison with an average value obtained from a large number of food experiments it may be justifiable to use a basal value of this kind, but in a comparison with the results of only one or two food experiments the variations in the single periods must be taken into consideration.